Book Review on Anglos and Mexicans in the Making of Texas
Open Preview
See a Problem?
Nosotros'd love your help. Let united states of america know what'due south wrong with this preview of Anglos and Mexicans in the Making of Texas, 1836-1986 by David Montejano.
Thanks for telling us nearly the problem.
Friend Reviews
To see what your friends idea of this book, please sign up.
Reader Q&A
Customs Reviews
· 72 ratings · 6 reviews
Outset your review of Anglos and Mexicans in the Making of Texas, 1836-1986
Something I did non realize about this book until I got to the Appendix is that it was written every bit a historical sociology. The author explained that their purpose was to identify political, economic, and social trends from the mass of disorganized and ambiguous data that they could pull out of various archives. As a upshot, this book differs from nigh "pure" history books in that personal narratives, main texts and artifacts, and a narrative account of immediately sequential events are not the Something I did not realize about this volume until I got to the Appendix is that it was written as a historical sociology. The author explained that their purpose was to place political, economical, and social trends from the mass of disorganized and ambiguous information that they could pull out of diverse athenaeum. Every bit a consequence, this book differs from about "pure" history books in that personal narratives, primary texts and artifacts, and a narrative account of immediately sequential events are not the bespeak of this book. The author instead focuses on information, statistics, and trends, but occasionally throwing in a quote that aptly sums upwards the trend they were discussing. While I still would have preferred an actual history book, this caption did alleviate many of my misgivings. I do think the author does a really skilful job of making their 300-page sociology NOT tiresome - the writer first identifies the trends that they observe, and so reconstructs the ideologies, competing factions, and weather that caused those trends. My but complaint is that for most of the book, Anglos are the but group that is shown to have actions, or have agenda, or present personal perspectives, or actually take quotes attributed to them - the Mexicans (the author rarely distinguished between Mexican immigrants and Mexican Americans) are a silent, passive, undifferentiated mass of exploited people. For example, the fourteen-page affiliate "The Culture of Segregation" devotes a grand total of two paragraphs (less than 1 page) to the Mexican-American perspective. The effect is that the book is not and then much "Anglos and Mexicans in the Making of Texas" as information technology is "Anglos arguing with each other near how to best exploit Mexicans, while the Mexicans only silently take information technology for 150 years". This is a great sociology of how Anglos interacted with, perceived, and exploited Mexicans - I wish this folklore equally addressed the experiences of Mexican Americans. ...more
January 27, 2021 Moses Hetfield rated information technology liked it · review of another edition
Recommended to Moses by: Albert Camarillo
This is definitely a dry, academic text that I wouldn't recommend to the casual reader, but I learned a lot from information technology. Montejano's approach is "historical sociology," significant that he focuses more than on the large flick of social systems (e.g. the development of class structures) than on, say, fun anecdotes about quirky characters in Due south Texas history. One critique is that Montejano (despite being Latino himself) draws almost exclusively from Anglo sources and writes largely from that perspective. This This is definitely a dry, bookish text that I wouldn't recommend to the casual reader, but I learned a lot from it. Montejano'south arroyo is "historical sociology," pregnant that he focuses more on the large picture of social systems (e.g. the evolution of class structures) than on, say, fun anecdotes about quirky characters in South Texas history. One critique is that Montejano (despite being Latino himself) draws almost exclusively from Anglo sources and writes largely from that perspective. This is understandable for the 19th century sections of the book, given the paucity (according to the author) of available sources from Texas Mexicans at that time, but there was definitely more of a written record in the 20th century that was all the same non reflected in his analysis. Overall, non a bad intro to S Texas history, but probably non worth reading if that's not a detail interest of yours. ...more
Dec 13, 2018 Mike Mena rated it really liked it
Authoritative history of Texas, with special focus on the lower tip of Texas. Standard, required reading for people serious about Texas history.
Anglo settlers were non the merely ones who wanted freedom from Mexico under Santa Anna. Many Texicans of Spanish descent joined the cause and one would serve as vice-president of the Commonwealth of Texas.
Related Articles
March is Women's History Month, dedicated to the written report, observance, and celebration of the vital role of women in American history. Some...
"The failure of retentivity, then is equally much sociological as it is historical." — 0 likes
"The absence of a sociological memory is nowhere more evident than in the study of race and ethnic relations in the southwest." — 0 likes
More quotes… Welcome dorsum. Simply a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads business relationship.
Source: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/347008.Anglos_and_Mexicans_in_the_Making_of_Texas_1836_1986
Post a Comment for "Book Review on Anglos and Mexicans in the Making of Texas"